Select your language

A. Relevance and sustainability context

A.1 Policy relevance

The indicator measures the final energy supplied from biomass across the three major energy sectors—heat, electricity, and transport—expressed in TWh or PJ. It captures the contribution of solid biomass, biogas, biomethane, liquid biofuels, and biodegradable waste to Germany's renewable energy system. The indicator thereby provides insights into the role of bioenergy in replacing fossil fuels.

German policy relevance

National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP): Relevant for monitoring progress towards Germany's 2030 bioenergy deployment targets in the heat, electricity, and transport sectors. The indicator assesses whether bioenergy use is on track to meet the NECP objectives. Responsible ministry: BMWE.

European Union policy relevance

  • Measures progress towards the targets of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), such as renewable energy shares in heating, electricity, and transport.
  • Supports the EU Bioeconomy Strategy by evaluating biomass utilization across economic sectors.
  • Assists in evaluating compliance with the EU Governance Regulation through reporting in National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs).

A.2 Sustainability and / or comparative evaluation options

In order to put the indicator into perspective, it should be complemented by indicators that show both the overall energy demand and the renewable energy contribution in each bioenergy sector. Hence, the following indicators can be described:

  • Bioenergy share of total final energy consumption (%), by bioenergy sector
  • Bioenergy share of renewable energy consumption (%), by bioenergy sector

B. Data availability

B.1 Stage of development

Semi-established indicator, since the reporting of the relevant data is well established (AGEE-Stat) and it is part of long-term and regularly updated initiatives.

B.2 Data sources

UBA: Zeitreihen zur Entwicklung der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland unter Verwendung von Daten der Arbeitsgruppe Erneuerbare Energien-Statistik (AGEE-Stat)

https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/klima-energie/erneuerbare-energien/erneuerbare-energien-in-zahlen#emissionsbilanz

https://datacube.uba.de/?fs[0]=Themen,0%7CEnergie%23ENERGY%23&pg=0&fc=Themen&bp=true&snb=9

B.3 Coverage over time and replicability

The data is available from 2000 until 2025. Further, there is a bi-annual reporting by UBA. Hence, the indicator can be updated yearly.

B.4 Coverage across scales and sectors; compatibility

Coverage at national scale. Compatible with EU data for country comparison. Sectoral breakdown by bioenergy sector possible. In the future, sub-sectors and further disaggregation of bioenergy sectors could be integrated (e.g. transport sector divided by aviation, maritime, road, rail, etc.). Further, possible future sectoral bioenergy demand targets, if outlined by the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) could be integrated for future years.

C. Considerations for operationalization

C.1 Feasibility: Fit for monitoring

The indicator is very fit for monitoring (methodologically sound, reliable, and fit for bioeconomy monitoring).

C.2 Institutions

UBA / AGEE-Stat

C.3 Future prospects

Indicator ready. Monitoring will be continued.

C.4 Costs, considerations and reproducibility

There is a conceivable interest in linking the data source to the bioeconomy monitoring.

C.5 Potential for automation

Strong: UBA provides data as API interface.

C.6 Presentation options and breakdown / sub-indicator needs

The indicator can show the historic absolute and relative trend developments of bioenergy use by sector and compare those to possible future goals.

C.7 Potential for scenario integration

There is a potential for scenario integration in bioeconomy scenarios and modelling, e.g. using past trends (status quo and future goals (NECP)).

C.8 Interlinkages and alignment with other monitoring activities

See figure 4.6 and 4.7 for previous indicator description in bioeconomy monitoring report: https://literatur.thuenen.de/digbib_extern/dn069207.pdf.

Alignment possible towards reporting in EU Governance Regulation Annex I.

Legend

Tier

Tier I describes the 30 core, priority indicators defined by the project that are highly relevant to represent a specific thematic area and which together with other Tier I indicators forms a systemic perspective of the various risks, opportunities and trade-offs within the Bioeconomy.

Tier II describes explanatory indicators that are of high priority and help to provide more specific information on trends within specific thematic areas.

Stage of development

Established:
Indicators which are already reported in other official monitoring systems

Semi-established:
Indicators which are developed by e.g. federal research institutes as part of long-term and regularly updated initiatives

New
Indicators not previously reported in an official capacity, but well established through research projects

Developing
Indicators under development with some reporting in new state-of-the research projects, but not subject to multiple years of revision and replication

Future
Indicator gaps requiring research for possible future integration

Robustness

Very robust:
methodologically sound, reliable, and fit for bioeconomy monitoring

Robust:
fit, but with acceptable uncertainty and/or potential challenges

Sufficient:
possibly fit, but with foreseeable challenges

Weak:
currently unfit, but short-term potential

Insufficient:
currently unfit, but with long-term potential